Chinese Agricultural Reform, the WTO and FTA Negotiations

Shunli Yao
Additional contact information
Shunli Yao: China Center for Economic Research

Trade Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract: China's early industrialization created distortions. This paper identifies major distortions in the Chinese economy in the pre-reform era and brings agricultural distortions into perspective. Comparison is made of the reform experience in Chinese industry and agriculture. It suggests that with limited arable land, it is difficult to align Chinese agricultural production fully with its comparative advantage without also reforming China's grain policy. Reform has substantially freed up agricultural production but border distortions serve as one of a few remaining effective measures to ensure the grain self-sufficiency target. Unlike agricultural protection in rich countries, China's grain self-sufficiency policy ahs much weaker institutional underpinnings and is susceptible to the influence of interest groups. The patterns of Chinese agricultural trade explain its ambiguous positions in WTO agriculture negotiations. In terms of grain sectoral adjustment, a possible comprehensive China-Australia FTA is consistent with the multilateral process, while the China-ASEAN FTA is not. There is no evidence that the China-ASEAN FTA helps with the WTO agriculture negotiations, particularly when rice is excluded from the deal; but China-Australia FTA could generate competitive liberalization in grain trade, and thus help with the global agricultural liberalization.

Keywords: Agricultural Trade; WTO; Free Trade Agreement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 F14 Q17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eaber.org/node/22018 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 301 [REDIRECT LOOP] Moved Permanently (http://www.eaber.org/node/22018 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22018 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22018 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22018 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22018 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22018 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22018 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22018)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eab:tradew:22018

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Trade Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shiro Armstrong ().