EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Keynes's General Theory: Interpreting the Interpretations

Bill Gerrard

Economic Journal, 1991, vol. 101, issue 405, 276-87

Abstract: This paper considers the confusion generated by the interpretations of Keynes's GENERAL THEORY. Drawing on the study of hermeneutics, it is argued that much of the confusion is caused by the adoption of presuppositions, often implicitly, about the nature of interpretation. Another contributory factor is the failure to distinguish between meaning as the aim of interpretation and significance as the aim of application. It is concluded that the existence of multiple interpretations should not be regarded as a problem but as evidence of the high reference power of Keynes's GENERAL THEORY through its ability to disclose different possible ways of understanding the macro economy. Copyright 1991 by Royal Economic Society.

Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819910 ... 0.CO%3B2-Q&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:101:y:1991:i:405:p:276-87

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:101:y:1991:i:405:p:276-87