Re-examining the Buffer-Stock Model of Money
Ross D Milbourne
Economic Journal, 1987, vol. 97, issue 388a, 130-42
Abstract:
This paper critically examines recent papers in the buffer stock or supply side disequilibrium models of money. The paper first investigates the assumptions at the m icroeconomic level and concludes that even with these assumptions, aggregate behavior does not necessarily follow buffer-stock models in which excess cash balances are held involuntarily. In a simple model with uncertain cash flows, it is shown that in the aggregate short-run involuntary cash holdings are negligible. If the buffer-stock story is applicable, it is to a broader definition of money than used in most empirical work. The second part of the paper examines empirical work and argues that the buffer-stock idea cannot be implemented using single equation techniques, and that when viewed appropriately, current empirical result s refute the buffer-stock idea as it is currently modeled. Copyright 1987 by Royal Economic Society.
Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819879 ... 0.CO%3B2-T&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:97:y:1987:i:388a:p:130-42
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen
More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().