Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Uni-Dimensional Opinions
Jeffrey H. Zwiebel,
Dimitri Vayanos and
Peter DeMarzo
Additional contact information
Jeffrey H. Zwiebel: Stanford U
Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business
Abstract:
We propose a boundedly-rational model of opinion formation where agents are subject to the phenomenon of persuasion. We argue that persuasion--whereby repeated exposure to an opinion has a cumulative effect on an agent's beliefs--is pervasive and closely related to the concept of social influence. In our model, agents communicate repeatedly according to a social network, but fail to adjust properly for possible repetitions of information they receive. We show that under general conditions, agents' beliefs converge over time to a common belief, which is a weighted average of initial beliefs. Agents' weights can be characterized in several manners related to their network position, and can be interpreted as a measure of social influence. Furthermore, agents' multi-dimensional beliefs generally converge to a single line prior to obtaining a consensus. Thus, long-run differences in opinion can be characterized by a uni-dimensional measure. We explore the implications of our model in several natural settings, including neighborhoods with bilateral communication, hierarchies, and political science.
Date: 2001-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)
Downloads: (external link)
http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1719.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to gsbapps.stanford.edu:443 (certificate verify failed) (http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1719.pdf [302 Found]--> https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1719.pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Unidimensional Opinions (2003) 
Working Paper: Persuasion bias, social influence, and uni-dimensional opinions (2003) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:stabus:1719
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().