Artificial intelligence as a social phenomenon: A bibliometric reading through the lenses of structural violence, intersectionality, and surveillance

Radu-Mihai Dumitrescu and Adrian-Nicolae Dan
Additional contact information
Radu-Mihai Dumitrescu: University of Bucharest, Romania
Adrian-Nicolae Dan: University of Bucharest, Romania

Sociology and Social Work Review, 2025, vol. 9, issue 2, 7-26

Abstract: This study investigates how social vulnerabilities associated with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine are reflected in recent biomedical literature and how these patterns correlate with central theoretical directions in sociology and social work. Through a bibliometric analysis of 2,589 meta-analyses and systematic reviews published between 2020 and 2025 in PubMed, the research maps the conceptual structure of the field using co-occurrence networks at two thresholds (5 and 20). The results show a concentration of discussions on the technical and clinical aspects of AI (diagnosis, predictive modelling, electronic health records, large language models), while terms expressing social and ethical concerns (equity, algorithmic bias, privacy, ethics, health disparities, clinical competence) occupy semi-peripheral positions in the network. Interpreting these structures through theoretical lenses such as structural violence, social determinants of health, intersectionality, algorithmic oppression, surveillance capitalism, and care ethics reveals that AI risks reproducing and intensifying pre-existing inequalities. The analysis emphasises that algorithmic bias, unequal data infrastructures, model opacity, and changes in the distribution of clinical work are not isolated phenomena, but manifestations of broader social processes that shape vulnerability and exclusion. Therefore, the study argues for the need to integrate sociological and social work perspectives into the development and evaluation of medical AI and advocates for interdisciplinary approaches that place equity, transparency, and the experiences of marginalised populations at the centre. Such an orientation is essential for AI in medicine to contribute to reducing — rather than amplifying — social inequalities in health.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; health equity; algorithmic bias; structural violence; social determinants of health; intersectionality; surveillance capitalism; ethics of care; digital health; bibliometric analysis; medical sociology; social work and health disparities. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I14 I18 O33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://globalresearchpublishing.com/wp-content/up ... and-surveillance.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:edr:sswrgl:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:7-26

Access Statistics for this article

Sociology and Social Work Review is currently edited by Serban Ionut

More articles in Sociology and Social Work Review from International Society for projects in Education and Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Serban Ionut ().