Fundamental comparative advantage versus random talent: An analysis using chess data

Asier Minondo ()

No 1605, Working Papers from Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia

Abstract: This paper analyzes the contribution of fundamental comparative advantage and random talent to explain differences in the number of expert chess players across countries. I posit a model where the quality of a chess player is determined by her innate talent and the fundamental comparative advantage of the country she is born. Using data on chess players FIDE ratings for 2015, I find that fundamental comparative advantage explains between 65% and 97% of the variation in the number of expert chess players across countries. Despite the appearance of chess servers that allow playing on-line and other tools to improve skills, I do not find convergence in comparative advantage over the period 2001-2015. I find that fundamental comparative advantage is highly positively correlated with the popularity of chess. These results highlight that a social preference might generate a more advanced technology which leads to a fundamental comparative advantage.

Keywords: comparative advantage; preferences; chess; Internet; convergence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-07
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://repecsrv.uv.es/paper/RePEc/pdf/eec_1605.pdf First version, 2016 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eec:wpaper:1605

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vicente Esteve ().