Reportable irregularities and audit quality: Insights from South Africa

Warren Maroun

Accounting forum, 2015, vol. 39, issue 1, 19-33

Abstract: In the aftermath of numerous corporate scandals and, more recently, the global financial crisis, the issue of audit quality is particularly relevant. Increasingly, numerous jurisdictions are relying on more exogenous forms of control over the audit profession in the interest of improving the quality of audit engagements and the reliability of audit reports. The purpose of this research is to examine the case for a form of mandatory whistle-blowing by South African auditors. Using an interpretive approach, this paper explores the association between a complementary reporting duty and notions of audit quality, recommending that a requirement for auditors to bring certain transgressions to the attention of an appropriate regulator can be a consideration for policy makers. At the same time, the research adds to the existing corporate governance literature by providing one of the first interpretive accounts of audit quality and reporting in a non Anglo-Saxon setting.

Keywords: Audit quality; Audit reports; External audit; ISQC 1; Reportable irregularities; South Africa; Whistle-blowing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0155998214000143
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:accfor:v:39:y:2015:i:1:p:19-33

DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2014.03.002

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting forum is currently edited by Glen Lehman

More articles in Accounting forum from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().