Performance evaluation bias: A comparative study on the role of financial fixation, similarity-to-self and likeability

Salvador Carmona, Govind Iyer and Philip M.J. Reckers

Advances in accounting, 2014, vol. 30, issue 1, 9-17

Abstract: Performance evaluations are critical to organizational control. Dissatisfaction with systems emphasizing financial targets only has driven many companies to adopt systems using multiple performance measures. These multiple measurement systems (MMS) however may exacerbate certain cognitive biases. Using multiple performance measures can be a cognitively complex task that invites coping reactions anchored in simplifying heuristic biases, such as the likability of the target evaluatee and similarity-to-self. There are reasons to believe that these biases may manifest differently across “individualistic” or “collectivist” cultures. Our study examines three biases (financial fixation, similarity-to-self and likeability) across two distant cultures (United States and Spain) along the individualistic–collectivist dimensions. Participants are MBA students from Spain and the US. Consistent with theory-based predictions, we find that likability and similarity-to-self impact Spanish participants while financial fixation presents greater influence among US participants. These findings underscore the importance of considering national culture in designing performance measurement systems and advise about the role of specific biases, which are not culturally neutral.

Keywords: Performance evaluation; Bias; National culture; Financial fixation; Similarity-to-self; Likeability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882611014000121
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:advacc:v:30:y:2014:i:1:p:9-17

DOI: 10.1016/j.adiac.2014.04.001

Access Statistics for this article

Advances in accounting is currently edited by Dennis Caplan

More articles in Advances in accounting from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().