EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Impacts of controlled irrigation and drainage on the yield and physiological attributes of rice

Guangcheng Shao, Jintao Cui, Yu, Shuang’en, Bin Lu, Boman J. Brian, Jihui Ding and Dongli She

Agricultural Water Management, 2015, vol. 149, issue C, 156-165

Abstract: Taking into account the likely contribution of rainwater to crop water requirements, is an alternative option for increasing the productivity of water in irrigated agriculture. We evaluated the response of yield and physiological characters to controlled irrigation and drainage (CID) at different growth stages of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Submergence at different stages was imposed in specially designed experimental tanks in 2009 and 2010 based on alternate wetting and drying technology (AWD, the control). Treatments include CID treatment at tiller stage (CID-Stage I), jointing–booting (CID-Stage II), panicle initiation (CID-Stage III), and milky stage (CID-Stage IV). Compared to the control, we observe a strong reduction in root length, root weight and root–shoot ratio were observed in the CID treatments. Under CID-Stage I and CID-Stage II, rice was characterized by faster shoot elongation, larger single leaf area extension, and more total dry mass, as a higher photosynthetic rate was maintained during and after submergence. The CID-Stage I and CID-Stage II treatments increased photosynthesis rate (PN) and transpiration (Tr) significantly compared to the control, but decreased average leaf water use efficiency (WUEL, defined as the ratio of PN to Tr) by 3.3% (2009) and 5% (2010). The PN and Tr also demonstrated close linear and quadratic relationships with stomatal conductance. Cultivation of rice under CID-Stage II resulted in 6% and 3% yield reduction over the control. This insignificant decrease in grain yield was due largely to the reduced percentage of filled gain. The lowest yields were obtained under CID-Stage I in 2009 and CID-Stage III treatments in 2010, respectively. The submergence-induced decrease in the number of panicles per unit area and number of spikelets per panicle were responsible for the lower yields obtained from those two stages. CID-Stage II had an average irrigation water productivity of 1.77kgm−3 for the two years, an increase of about 9% from the control.

Keywords: Photosynthesis; Biomass production; Water saving; Alternate wetting and drying; Water productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377414003539
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:149:y:2015:i:c:p:156-165

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.11.002

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:149:y:2015:i:c:p:156-165