Modeling reference evapotranspiration with calculated targets. Assessment and implications

Pau Martí, Pablo González-Altozano, Ramón López-Urrea, Luis A. Mancha and Jalal Shiri

Agricultural Water Management, 2015, vol. 149, issue C, 81-90

Abstract: Due to the absence of experimental reference evapotranspiration (ETo) records, data-driven models consider in most cases calculated ETo targets to train and test the models, usually according to the standard FAO56 Penman Monteith equation (FAO56-PM). This procedure is also adopted for calibrating more conventional empirical approaches like the well-known Hargreaves (HG) equation. This study aims at assessing the performance implications derived from using calculated targets instead of experimental measurements for training and testing data-driven models or calibrating empirical methods. Therefore an application of a gene expression programming (GEP) based approach for estimating ETo is presented considering calculated and lysimetric targets fed with two different input combinations and assessed through k-fold testing. The same procedure is adopted to evaluate the calibration of the HG equation. Finally, the FAO56-PM and the HG equations are compared with their corresponding GEP models bearing in mind the type of targets used. The locally trained GEP4 and GEP6 models trained using the experimental lysimetric targets are more accurate than the corresponding HG and FAO56-PM equations, assessed using lysimetric benchmarks. The external performance accuracy of GEP4 and GEP6 models decreases considerably in the cross-station approach using experimental targets. In this case, the FAO56-PM and the HG equations might be preferable. The accuracy of the GEP models trained with calculated targets decreases considerably when the performance is assessed using experimental benchmarks. The conclusions drawn when only calculated benchmarks are used might be not sound or even false. The same applies for empirical equations calibrated with calculated targets. Four new GEP-based equations (one per input combination and station) are provided to estimate ETo.

Keywords: Reference evapotranspiration; Calculated targets; Data driven models; Calibration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377414003485
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:149:y:2015:i:c:p:81-90

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.10.028

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().