EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Application of inclusive multiple model for the prediction of saffron water footprint

Zahra Gerkani Nezhad Moshizi, Ommolbanin Bazrafshan, Hadi Ramezani Etedali, Yahya Esmaeilpour and Brain Collins

Agricultural Water Management, 2023, vol. 277, issue C

Abstract: Applying new approaches in the management of water resources is a vital issue, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. The water footprint is a key index in water management. Therefore, it is necessary to predict its changes for future durations. The soft computing model is one of the most widely used models in predicting and estimating agroclimatic variables. The purpose of this study is to predict the green and blue water footprints of saffron product using the soft computing model. In order to select the most effective variables in prediction water footprints, the individual input was eliminated one by one and the effect of each on the residual mean square error (RMSE) was measured. In the first stage, the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and evolutionary algorithms have been applied. In the next stage, the output of individual models was incorporated into the Inclusive Multiple Model (IMM) as the input variables in order to predict the blue and green water footprints of saffron product in three homogenous agroclimatic regions. Finally, the uncertainty of the model caused by the input and parameters was evaluated. The contributions of this research are introducing optimized GMDH and new ensemble models for predicting BWF, and GWF, uncertainty analysis and investigating effective inputs on the GWF and BWF. The results indicated that the most important variables affecting green and blue water footprints are plant transpiration, evapotranspiration, and yield, since removing these variables significantly increased the RMSE (range=11–25). Among the GMDH models, the best performance belonged to NMRA (Naked Mole Ranked Algorithm) due to the fast convergence and high accuracy of the outputs. In this regard, the IMM has a better performance (FSD=0.76, NSE=0.95, MAE) = 8, PBIAS= 8) than the alternatives due to applying the outputs of several individual models and the lowest uncertainty based on the parameters and inputs of the model (p = 0.98, r = 0.08).

Keywords: Water footprint; Saffron; Crop and climate variables; Group method of data handling; Evolutionary algorithms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422006722
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:277:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422006722

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108125

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:277:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422006722