Paired-field evaluation of a saturated buffer reveals significant water-quality benefits through upstream weir management

Ehsan Ghane, Yousef Abdalaal and Ashkan Tehrani

Agricultural Water Management, 2025, vol. 318, issue C

Abstract: Past studies evaluating the conservation drainage practice of saturated buffers (SB) have used the water flowing over the upstream weir as a control, assuming that upstream weir management does not reduce flow and nitrate load. The objectives are to (1) investigate whether the upstream weir functions as controlled drainage (CD) to provide water-quality benefits beyond those from the buffer flow (BF, defined as water diverted into the buffer), and (2) evaluate the performance of the SB system under high (shallow) and low (deep) weir management levels. From June 2019 to September 2024, we conducted a paired-field study at an on-farm site in Michigan, USA, comparing an SB system to a free drainage control field. Using this method, we separated the two components of the SB system into CD and BF. Results revealed a significant reduction in nitrate-N load (54.5% and 11.1 kg/ha annually, p-value < 0.01) of the SB system compared to free drainage. The CD component emerged as the dominant contributor to nitrate-N load removal (48.0% and 9.6 kg/ha annually), confirming the crucial water-quality role of upstream weir management. Studies that ignored the water-quality effect of the CD component likely underestimated the performance of SB. The BF component contributed to only 6.4% of nitrate-N load reduction. High-level weir setting significantly removed more nitrate-N (0.076 kg/ha daily) than low-level setting (0.036 kg/ha daily). In conclusion, this study shows the significant water-quality contribution of the CD component and underscores the importance of weir management for enhancing nitrate load removal.

Keywords: Conservation drainage; Controlled drainage; Nitrate; Paired-field design; Saturated riparian buffer; Subsurface drainage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425003786
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:318:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425003786

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109664

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().