Evaluating ecosystem service trade-offs along a land-use intensification gradient in central Veracruz, Mexico

Z. Carter Berry, Kelly W. Jones, Leon Rodrigo Gomez Aguilar, Russell G. Congalton, Friso Holwerda, Randall Kolka, Nathaniel Looker, Sergio Miguel Lopez Ramirez, Robert Manson, Alex Mayer, Lyssette Muñoz-Villers, Perla Ortiz Colin, Humberto Romero-Uribe, Leonardo Saenz, Juan Jose Von Thaden, Mariana Quetzalli Vizcaíno Bravo, Guadalupe Williams-Linera and Heidi Asbjornsen

Ecosystem Services, 2020, vol. 45, issue C

Abstract: It is generally assumed that forests improve ecosystem service (ES) provisioning within landscapes. These assumptions drive policies (e.g. Payment for Ecosystem Services) that affect land-use without knowing if the desired services are achieved. Here we use a data-intensive approach to explore the synergies and tradeoffs between three regulating (hydrologic regulation, water quality, carbon storage) and one supporting ES (biodiversity). Using field-based measurements for ten ES indicators collected within eight land use/land cover (LULC) types we assess: (1) the relationship between ES indicators and LULC type and (2) the synergies and tradeoffs across ES indicators. For objective one, we found that primary forests promote more favorable hydrological services, including having greater base flow, flow regulation, and soil conductivity. For objective two, we observed synergies across many ES where management of one would improve provisioning for several other ES, specifically between low flow, carbon storage, and biodiversity. However, many ES parameters (e.g. water quality) had no relationship with other ES parameters. Our results underscore the value of site-specific research in addressing assumptions about the relationship between LULC and ES provisioning. More site-specific data is needed for more informed design of management strategies that can maximize ES benefits.

Keywords: Environmental services; Watersheds; Land use intensity; Payment for ecosystem services; Cloud forests; Shade grown coffee; Montane landscapes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041620301236
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:45:y:2020:i:c:s2212041620301236

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101181

Access Statistics for this article

Ecosystem Services is currently edited by Leon C Braat

More articles in Ecosystem Services from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().