EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Facilitating an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm to solve an integrated choice and latent variable (ICLV) model with fully correlated latent variables

Dasol Chae, Jaeyoung Jung and Keemin Sohn

Journal of choice modelling, 2018, vol. 26, issue C, 64-79

Abstract: It is well known that estimating the parameters of an integrated choice and latent variable (ICLV) model is not a trivial undertaking. The log-likelihood of an ICLV model cannot be evaluated analytically, and can only be evaluated by a simulation that requires large numbers of sample draws. While conducting simulation-based model estimations, researchers often encounter an estimation failure. Sohn (2017) suggests a novel estimation method to circumvent the problem by using an expectation-maximization algorithm (EM). However, a drawback of this method continues to be the requirement of a huge amount of computer memory to deal with an augmented covariance matrix. In the present study, this problem was overcome by connecting each latent variable in a structural equation to all individual specific variables. This restriction did not hamper the utility of an ICLV model during empirical experimentation. The main contribution of this study is to introduce a simple method devised to solve large-scale ICLV models.

Keywords: Choice model; Latent variable; Fully connected structural equation; Expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm; Seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534517300180
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:26:y:2018:i:c:p:64-79

DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2017.08.001

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of choice modelling is currently edited by S. Hess and J.M. Rose

More articles in Journal of choice modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:26:y:2018:i:c:p:64-79