EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Decarbonization of power markets under stability and fairness: Do they influence efficiency?

Christoph Weissbart

Energy Economics, 2020, vol. 85, issue C

Abstract: Market integration is seen as a complementary measure to decarbonize energy markets. In the context of power markets, this translates into regions that coordinate to maximize welfare in the power market with respect to a climate target. Yet, the maximization of overall welfare through cooperation leads to redistribution and can result in the reduction of a region's welfare compared to the case without cooperation. This paper assesses why cooperation in the European power market is not stable from the perspective of single regions and identifies cost allocations that increase fairness. In a first step, the EU-REGEN model is applied to find the future equilibrium outcome of the European power market under a cooperative, subadditive cost sharing game. Second, resulting cost allocations are analyzed by means of cooperative game theory concepts. Results show that the value of cooperation under a tight emission reduction target is a € 69 billion reduction in discounted system cost over the next 30 years, and rational behavior of regions can maintain at most 16% of this cost reduction. The evaluation of alternative cost allocations reveals the trade-off between accounting for robustness against cost changes and individual rationality. Moreover, the cost-efficient decarbonization path of the European power sector under the grand coalition is characterized by the interplay between wind power, gas power, and biomass with geologic storage of CO2. With singleton coalitions only, the market outcome shifts to a higher contribution from nuclear power. The findings of this analysis suggest that future EU regulation should include more comprehensive transfer schemes to facilitate the efficient implementation of a transformation path.

Keywords: European power market; Cooperative game theory; Cost sharing; Energy modeling; Investment planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C61 C71 L94 Q41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098831930177X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:85:y:2020:i:c:s014098831930177x

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.05.023

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant

More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:85:y:2020:i:c:s014098831930177x