Optimal regimes of prescribed burning in forest plantations in the presence of risk of wildfires in the southeastern United States

Andres Susaeta and Tyler Carney

Forest Policy and Economics, 2023, vol. 151, issue C

Abstract: We examine the optimal timing of prescribed burning and its effect on the optimal forest management of a forest plantation under wildfire risk in the southeastern United States. Based on the frequency of prescribed fires and wildfire risk, we define different management regimes, assuming that the forest stand can be completely destroyed and partially destroyed–considering a salvage rate of k = 15% and 30%– after a wildfire. Our results indicate that more intensive forest management requires more prescribed fires, resulting in higher costs of prescribed burning. In scenarios with low, medium, and high levels of management intensity, the fully destroyed stand requires 6, 12, and 16 prescribed fires, with costs of $150.4, $168.8, and $264.5 acre−1, respectively. The partially destroyed stand requires 6, 12, and 21 prescribed fires with costs of $89.1(k = 0.15) and $86.9(k = 0.3), $180.5(k = 0.15) and $227.1 (k = 0.3), and $326.8(k = 0.15) and $326.1(k = 0.3) acre−1. The economic rents associated with prescribed burning are relatively small, with most of the changes being driven by the reduction of wildfire risk. Without risk of wildfires, prescribed fires might not be necessary. In such cases, the use of herbicides or a combination of prescribed burning and herbicides could be more appropriate.

Keywords: Prescribed fires; Wildfire risk; Slash pine; Plantation; Net present value (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934123000515
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:151:y:2023:i:c:s1389934123000515

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102956

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().