Potential impact of carbon trading on forest management in New Zealand

Bruce Manley and Piers Maclaren

Forest Policy and Economics, 2012, vol. 24, issue C, 35-40

Abstract: The New Zealand Government has enacted an emissions trading scheme (ETS) under which owners of Kyoto-compliant forests will receive/surrender units for increases/decreases in the carbon stocks of their plantations. Each unit represents one tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2) and can be traded. In this paper we evaluate the potential impact of the ETS on forest management decisions including whether to establish new forest, choice of species and silviculture, and forest rotation length. Criteria used in the analysis are financial return (LEV or NPV) and carbon price risk (cost or percentage of units to be surrendered after harvest). Results show that carbon trading has the potential to increase forest profitability and influence the choice of silviculture. Forest rotation length increases with expected carbon price. However there is considerable risk arising from carbon prices. We develop strategies that hedge against carbon price risk at both the stand level and the forest estate level. The former include growing a valuable crop and trading only a portion of units received. The latter includes managing forest structure via age-class composition. We evaluate trade-offs between financial return and risk in order to identify the opportunity cost of strategies that are robust against future carbon prices.

Keywords: Carbon price risk; Carbon trading; Forest management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934110000225
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:24:y:2012:i:c:p:35-40

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.01.001

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().