Trade-offs between fire prevention and provision of ecosystem services in Slovenia

Robert Mavsar, Anže Japelj and Marko Kovač

Forest Policy and Economics, 2013, vol. 29, issue C, 62-69

Abstract: Forests have a potential to provide the society with a number of different ecosystem services. Their actual provision depends upon the demand expressed by different stakeholder groups. To comply with the expressed needs for the provision, forest managers have to define management objectives and implement management measures. However, limited financial resources designated for forest management and possible conflicts between different stakeholders often oblige forest managers to make trade-offs. To define the importance of specific services, interaction with stakeholder groups is one of the key features. In case of large stakeholder groups, like the general public, opinion pools can be used to obtain the information needed to make the necessary decisions. In the paper we present the relative importance of fire prevention measures in comparison to recreation, water purification, and animal and plant diversity in Slovenia. This information was obtained by conducting a choice modelling experiment. The results of the study show that the general public does not consider fires as an important threat to Slovenian forests and that fire prevention is less important than provision of other ecosystem services, considered in the study. At the same time, respondents believe that fire prevention measures in Slovenian forests are not adequate.

Keywords: Ecosystem services; Fire prevention; Economic valuation; Social value; Choice modelling; Public preferences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934112002699
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:29:y:2013:i:c:p:62-69

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.011

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().