EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Revealed social preferences and joint forest management outcomes

Pradeep Kumar and Shashi Kant

Forest Policy and Economics, 2016, vol. 72, issue C, 37-45

Abstract: We explored the role of revealed social preferences in the variation of JFM outcomes. To find out the social preferences of villagers, public goods game was organized in five randomly chosen villages in central India. At the village level, strong positive correlation was found between the average allocation to public good in the game and success of JFM in the village. In two villages, which had high success in JFM, villagers' social preferences were reciprocity, while in three other villages, which had moderate to low success in JFM, villagers' social preferences were commitment. We also found that demographic, economic, and social factors did not consistently explain individuals' preferences.

Keywords: Joint forest management; Social preference; Public goods game; Reciprocity; Commitment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934116301320
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:72:y:2016:i:c:p:37-45

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.013

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:72:y:2016:i:c:p:37-45