 Prospect Theory predictions in the field: Risk seekers in settings of weak accounting controlsA. Rashad Abdel-khalik Journal of Accounting Literature, 2014, vol. 33, issue 1, 58-84 Abstract: In his review of 30 years of research in Prospect Theory, Barberis (2013) notes that support for Prospect Theory had come mainly from the laboratory. In this paper, I write about a recurring phenomenon in real life that is consistent with Prospect Theory predictions in decision-making loss domain. The 60 cases noted in this paper are associated with specific risk seekers that had cost more than $140 billion (an average of $2.33 billion per case). Given space consider–ations, I provide synopses for 14 cases. A few of these cases have been discussed in the extant literature in connection with internal control, but were not considered from the perspective of Prospect Theory. It is striking that these cases are costly, all participants are young men, and almost all had followed the gambler's martingale strategy – i.e., double down. While these cases are informative about risk-seeking behavior, they are not sufficiently systematic to be subjected to stylized archival research methods. Keywords: Loss of control; Gambler's martingale; Risk seeking; Prospect Theory; Decision-making under stress; Fraud; Financial Derivatives; Accounting systems (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joacli:v:33:y:2014:i:1:p:58-84 DOI: 10.1016/j.acclit.2014.10.001 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Accounting Literature is currently edited by S. Asare and W. R. Knechel More articles in Journal of Accounting Literature from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.