The costs and benefits of long-short investing: A perspective on the market efficiency literature

William Beaver, Maureen McNichols and Richard Price

Journal of Accounting Literature, 2016, vol. 37, issue C, 1-18

Abstract: We highlight key assumptions implicit in the models used by academics conducting research on market efficiency. Most notably, many academics assume that investors can borrow unlimited amounts and construct long-short portfolios at zero cost. We relax these assumptions and examine the attractiveness of long-short strategies as stand-alone investments and as a part of a diversified portfolio. Our analysis illustrates that the key benefit of long-short investing is adding diversification to a portfolio beyond what the market provides. We show that as stand-alone investments, nontrivial risk remains in the “hedge†strategies and that the returns generally do not beat the market in a head-to-head contest. Our findings raise questions about the degree of inefficiency in anomaly studies because plausible measures of costs generally offset strategy returns. The ability to achieve greater diversification may be, but is not necessarily, due to market inefficiency. We also highlight the key role of the generally ignored but critically important short interest rebate and show that absent this rebate, the long-short strategies we examine generally yield insignificant returns.

Keywords: Accounting-based anomalies; Long-short strategies; Short selling; Market efficiency; Sharpe ratio; Short interest rebates (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G12 G14 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0737460715300392
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joacli:v:37:y:2016:i:c:p:1-18

DOI: 10.1016/j.acclit.2016.07.001

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting Literature is currently edited by S. Asare and W. R. Knechel

More articles in Journal of Accounting Literature from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().