Commodity futures hedge ratios: A meta-analysis

Jędrzej Białkowski, Martin T. Bohl and Devmali Perera

Journal of Commodity Markets, 2023, vol. 30, issue C

Abstract: The derivative accounting standard requires hedging to satisfy the 80–125 rule to be eligible to apply the hedge accounting treatment. This means the hedging relationship should achieve hedging effectiveness within the 80%–125% level to qualify for hedge accounting. The appropriateness of this screening criterion is questioned in the existing literature, and there is hardly any empirical evidence to justify the suitability of this threshold level of hedge effectiveness. By applying meta-analysis methodology for 1699 hedge ratios collected from previous academic studies in commodity futures hedging, we show that the average optimal hedge ratio in commodity futures hedging in the academic literature mostly overlaps with the 80–125 threshold.

Keywords: Commodity markets; Derivative accounting; Hedging effectiveness; Meta-analysis; Optimal hedge ratio; 80–125 rule; Publication bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C01 M41 Q02 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851322000332
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jocoma:v:30:y:2023:i:c:s2405851322000332

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomm.2022.100276

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Commodity Markets is currently edited by Marcel Prokopczuk, Betty Simkins and Sjur Westgaard

More articles in Journal of Commodity Markets from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().