Identification of important marine areas around the Japanese Archipelago: Establishment of a protocol for evaluating a broad area using ecologically and biologically significant areas selection criteria

Yamakita, Takehisa; Yamamoto, Hiroyuki; Nakaoka, Masahiro; Yamano, Hiroya; Fujikura, Katsunori; Hidaka, Kiyotaka; Hirota, Yuichi; Ichikawa, Tadafumi; Kakehi, Shigeho; Kameda, Takahiko; Kitajima, Satoshi; Kogure, Kazuhiro; Komatsu, Teruhisa; Kumagai, Naoki H.; Miyamoto, Hiroomi; Miyashita, Kazushi; Morimoto, Haruyuki; Nakajima, Ryota; Nishida, Shuhei; Nishiuchi, Kou; Sakamoto, Shingo; Sano, Masayoshi; Sudo, Kenji; Sugisaki, Hiroya; Tadokoro, Kazuaki; Tanaka, Katsuhiko; Jintsu-Uchifune, Yoshie; Watanabe, Kentaro; Watanabe, Hiromi; Yara, Yumiko; Yotsukura, Norishige; Shirayama, Yoshihisa

Identification of important marine areas around the Japanese Archipelago: Establishment of a protocol for evaluating a broad area using ecologically and biologically significant areas selection criteria

Takehisa Yamakita, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Masahiro Nakaoka, Hiroya Yamano, Katsunori Fujikura, Kiyotaka Hidaka, Yuichi Hirota, Tadafumi Ichikawa, Shigeho Kakehi, Takahiko Kameda, Satoshi Kitajima, Kazuhiro Kogure, Teruhisa Komatsu, Naoki H. Kumagai, Hiroomi Miyamoto, Kazushi Miyashita, Haruyuki Morimoto, Ryota Nakajima, Shuhei Nishida, Kou Nishiuchi, Shingo Sakamoto, Masayoshi Sano, Kenji Sudo, Hiroya Sugisaki, Kazuaki Tadokoro, Katsuhiko Tanaka, Yoshie Jintsu-Uchifune, Kentaro Watanabe, Hiromi Watanabe, Yumiko Yara, Norishige Yotsukura and Yoshihisa Shirayama

Marine Policy, 2015, vol. 51, issue C, 136-147

Abstract: After the adoption of the Aichi Target, data accumulation and evaluation regarding biodiversity have progressed rapidly. The use of ecologically and biologically significant areas (EBSAs) criteria to evaluate important areas enables the identification of effective and prioritized areas for ecosystem management. This includes strategic environmental assessment and discussions aimed at establishing protected marine areas based on scientific data. This paper reviews previous and current ideas as well as the methods used, for the identification of EBSAs. In particular, the following issues are addressed: problems associated with different types of marine ecosystems in the Japanese Archipelago, such as seagrass and seaweed beds, coral reefs, offshore pelagic plankton, and deep-sea benthic ecosystems; and problems associated with the integration of multiple criteria that are not totally exclusive. Several candidate variables accounting for each of the 7 criteria used to identify ecologically important areas are presented. Data availability is the most important criterion that allowed for the comprehensive evaluation of different types of ecosystems in the same localities. In particular, for coastal ecosystems such as seagrass, seaweed beds, and coral reefs, it is possible to carry out broad spatial comparisons using variables representing most of these 7 criteria. Regarding methods for the quantitative evaluation of each criterion and their integration, application of these methods to kelp forest ecosystems in Hokkaido, Northern Japan is presented as a case study.

Keywords: Algal-; Seagrass bed; Coral reef; Plankton; Deep-sea; Marine protected areas (MPAs); Complementarity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X14001833
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:marpol:v:51:y:2015:i:c:p:136-147

DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.07.009

Access Statistics for this article

Marine Policy is currently edited by Eddie Brown

More articles in Marine Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().