The impact of an SEC investigation on conference call participation and analysts’ forecast quality

Antoinette L. Smith, Elio Alfonso and Robert Hogan

Research in Accounting Regulation, 2018, vol. 30, issue 2, 148-158

Abstract: We examine the impact of a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigation of Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) violations on participation during conference calls and on analysts’ forecast quality. We hand-collected conference call transcript data for quarterly conference calls surrounding the date of the SEC investigation announcement over the period 2002 – 2013. We find that management's discriminatory practices are significantly higher for firms under investigation for a Reg FD violation, but management's discriminatory practices significantly decrease after a Reg FD investigation is announced. In this post-investigation period, there is greater forecast accuracy and lower forecast dispersion for firms under investigation compared to firms not being investigated. Overall, we find that when the SEC publicly discloses the existence of a Reg FD investigation, there is a decrease in management's discriminatory practices on quarterly conference calls, an increase in forecast accuracy, and a decrease in forecast dispersion. Our findings suggest that the SEC should publicly announce its investigations as soon as possible given the positive implications for the investing public, analysts, and management's discriminatory practices.

Keywords: Analysts; Forecast; Conference calls participation; Reg. FD; SEC Investigation; Data Availability: The data used in this study are publicly available (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045718300304
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reacre:v:30:y:2018:i:2:p:148-158

DOI: 10.1016/j.racreg.2018.09.006

Access Statistics for this article

Research in Accounting Regulation is currently edited by G. Previts

More articles in Research in Accounting Regulation from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().