Risk and benefits brought by formal sustainability programs on fashion enterprises under market disruption

Wing-Yan Li, Tsan-Ming Choi and Pui-Sze Chow

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2015, vol. 104, issue PB, 348-353

Abstract: The recent global 2008 financial crisis created a big market disruption to the fashion industry. Since then, it has seriously hurt the performance of many companies in the fashion industry. It is known that implementation of formal sustainability programs of most fashion companies relate a lot to their resource management as well as supply chain structure. A natural question on “how the formal sustainability program affects the fashion enterprises under the market disruption” hence arises. To answer this question, we collect publicly available real data of 45 listed fashion enterprises and conduct an empirical statistical study. To be specific, we compare the business performances of the fashion groups with and without formal sustainability programs before and after the market disruption. We find some statistically significant results which reveal that fashion enterprises which have not established formal sustainability programs perform relatively well under the market disruption. After that, we drill deeper and show that the “fashionable” fashion groups (SFFGs) which have developed sustainability programs suffer a drop in ROE and there is no enhancement in any other dimensions. For the “basic” fashion groups (SBFGs), their sales drop after market disruption but actually they can reduce cost and maintain profitability. We further discuss our findings and generate important managerial insights.

Keywords: Sustainability programs; Market disruption; Business performance; Fashion enterprises; Risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344914001748
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:104:y:2015:i:pb:p:348-353

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.08.005

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().