Losses and efficiencies of phosphorus on a national level – A comparison of European substance flow analyses

Michael Jedelhauser and Claudia R. Binder

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2015, vol. 105, issue PB, 294-310

Abstract: The sustainable management of phosphorus (P), an essential element for life, is currently discussed intensively in research and policy. In order to provide a data basis for national P strategies, various substance flow analyses (SFA) of P on a national level have been published in recent years. The quantification of flows and stocks helps to identify hot-spots and potentials for sustainable measures within the particular country analysed. However, the national SFAs that have been conducted so far differ with regard to their system definitions, i.e. the processes, flows and stocks identified. This makes comparisons between countries difficult, hinders the transnational transfer of lessons learnt and hampers supranational policy efforts. Therefore, we (i) develop a standardised visualisation format, i.e. a blueprint, which allows for transnational comparability and facilitates future national SFAs of P; (ii) present a systematic comparative analysis of seven European SFAs (Austria, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom) using fluxes, indicators and cluster analysis; and (iii) to exemplarily show the added value of a linkage between material flow analysis and social system analysis. Our results show regional disparities with regard to losses and efficiencies of current national P use and to the potential of secondary P to increase national self-sufficiency. The countries analysed can be categorised in three clusters providing a first classification according to selected variables comprising key flows and indicators. By using the current discussion on the application of sewage sludge on agricultural land in Germany as an example, we show the added value of the integration of flow and governance analyses.

Keywords: Phosphorus; Substance flow analysis; Comparative study; European countries; Losses; Efficiencies; Cluster analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915300999
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:105:y:2015:i:pb:p:294-310

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.021

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().