Sustainability evaluation of recycling in agricultural systems by emergy accounting

Xiaolong Wang, Zhejin Li, Pan Long, Lingling Yan, Wangsheng Gao, Yuanquan Chen and Peng Sui

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2017, vol. 117, issue PB, 114-124

Abstract: Recycling wasted biomass as organic fertilizer has been an important road to develop sustainable agriculture. Emergy evaluation (EME) is a widely used method to evaluate sustainability of agricultural systems. However, the contribution of recycled biomass on emergy efficiency and sustainability of investigated systems cannot be comprehensively and reasonably represented, to some extent, by the currently used forth emergy rule. In this study, therefore, an “emformation” concept is introduced to illustrate that the recycled biomass derived from different agricultural processes only contains the emergy stored in its organic matter. Meanwhile, a formulas is designed to account the energy contribution of recycled biomass for recycling agricultural systems. A case study on wheat-maize double-cropping systems fertilized by crop straw (CS), pig manure (PM), wine residue (WR), biogas residue (BR) and mushroom residue (MR) in the North China Plain is performed to compare with the system only applying mineral fertilizer (CK). Several emergy-based indices, such as unit emergy value (UEV), nonrenewable resource efficiency (NRE), recycle yield ratio (RYR), emergy yield ratio (EYR), emergy loading ratio (ELR) and emergy sustainability index (ESI) are calculated, in which the EYR and ESI are modified to reflect the influence of applying recycled biomass on the sustainability of recycling agricultural systems. Result shows that the UEVs and NREs of the CS, PM, WR, BR and MR are 22.0%–77.3% higher than that of the CK, the RYR of the CS is 31.6% lower than that of the PM, WR, BR and MR, the modified EYRs of the CS, PM, WR, BR and MR increase by 67.6%–81.4% compared to the CK, the ELR are 8.4%–75.4% higher for the PM, WR and MR but 6.7%–29.1% lower for the CS and BR than that of the CK, the modified ESI of the CS, PM, WR, BR and MR increase by 3.5%–136.8% compared to the CK. Generally, the results illustrate that the modified approach contribute to achieving more reasonable evaluation results for agricultural systems involving recycled biomass. The wheat-maize systems fertilized by recycled biomass consume the more emergy and nonrenewable resources to generate the unit product. The recycling agricultural systems show the higher sustainability, in which recycling biogas residue into field as organic fertilizer shows the best recycling benefits.

Keywords: Recycling agricultural systems; Emergy evaluation; Agricultural waste; Emergy loss; Recycled biomass (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916303251
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:117:y:2017:i:pb:p:114-124

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.009

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().