Assessment of feedstocks for biogas production, part I—A multi-criteria approach

Roozbeh Feiz and Jonas Ammenberg

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2017, vol. 122, issue C, 373-387

Abstract: Expansion of biogas production is dependent on the availability of suitable feedstocks (biomass). What feedstock is suitable is a question that can be tackled from many different perspectives—it is a multi-dimensional problem. Therefore, a multi-criteria method has been developed that can be used to assess the suitability of feedstock for biogas and biofertilizer production. The method covers aspects of resource efficiency and feasibility, and the potential to supply renewable energy and recycle nutrients, operationalized via 16 indicators directed towards cost efficiency, technological feasibility, energy and environmental performance, accessibility, competition, policy and other issues. Thus it is relatively comprehensive method, yet simple enough to be used by practitioners. The main ambition, applying the method, has been to collect and structure relevant information to facilitate strategic overviews, communication and informed decision making. This is relevant for development within the biogas and biofertilizer industry, to define and prioritize among essential research projects, regarding policy, etc. This article, the first of two associated articles, is focused on the method itself. For illustration, the method is applied to assess the suitability of producing biogas from “stickleback”, which is a non-edible fish in the Baltic Sea region. In the companion article (Part II), four other feedstocks are assessed in detail, namely ley crops, straw, farmed blue mussels, and source-sorted food waste.

Keywords: Multi-criteria analysis; Biogas; Biofertilizer; Resource efficiency; Feasibility; Strategic decision making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344917300307
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:122:y:2017:i:c:p:373-387

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.019

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().