Energy consumption comparison for different asphalt pavements rehabilitation techniques used in Chile

Guillermo Thenoux, Álvaro González and Rafael Dowling

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2007, vol. 49, issue 4, 325-339

Abstract: In developing countries without the availability of reliable pavement management systems, recycling techniques may offer the best alternative for pavement structural rehabilitation. However, for many government officials and contractors there is a clear understanding of the technical advantages of recycling but not a clear perspective of cost saving. Since cost is a relative value among different regions of any country the following work makes an energy analysis of the construction process of the three different rehabilitation techniques available in Chile. Three different structural pavement rehabilitation alternatives were studied and compared using an energy consumption methodology:•Asphalt overlay;•Reconstruction;•Cold in place recycling with foamed asphalt.

Keywords: Energy; Environment; Rehabilitation; Pavement; Recycling; Foamed bitumen (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344906000863
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:49:y:2007:i:4:p:325-339

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.02.005

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().