Basic petrochemicals from natural gas, coal and biomass: Energy use and CO2 emissions

Tao Ren and Martin K. Patel

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2009, vol. 53, issue 9, 513-528

Abstract: While high-value basic petrochemicals (HVCs) are mostly produced through conventional naphtha and ethane-based process routes, it is also possible to produce them through coal and biomass-based routes. In this paper, we compared these routes in terms of energy use and CO2 emissions per ton of HVCs. (The term ton and abbreviation t should be read in this paper as a metric ton or 1000kg.) Within the cradle-to-grave system boundary, we found the following:•The total energy use of the conventional routes is the lowest (about 60GJ/t HVCs, of which 50GJ is the calorific value of HVCs) whereas that of the methane-based routes is 30% higher, and that of the coal and biomass-based routes is about 60–150% higher.•The total CO2 emissions of conventional and methane-based routes are about 4–5tons CO2/t HVCs whereas those from the biomass-based routes range from 2tons CO2/t HVCs (a maize-based ethanol related route) to 4tons CO2 avoided per ton HVCs (a lignocellulosic biomass-based Fischer–Tropsch route). Avoided CO2 emissions are due to electricity co-generation. The total CO2 emissions of coal-based routes are by far the highest (8–11tons CO2/t HVCs). An exception is a coal-based route with CO2 capture and sequestration features, for which CO2 emissions are similar to those of the conventional routes. It is technically possible to add CO2 capture and sequestration features to any of the routes mentioned above.

Keywords: Coal; Biomass; Basic petrochemicals; Energy use and CO2 emissions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344909000603
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2009:i:9:p:513-528

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.04.005

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().