EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The hybrid causal logic methodology for risk assessment: Quantification algorithm

Frank J. Groen, Chengdong Wang, Ali Mosleh and Tarannom Parhizkar

Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2026, vol. 265, issue PB

Abstract: The foundation of scenario modeling in traditional probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) methods, dating back to the seminal WASH-100 study, is built on the integration of event trees (ET), or event sequence diagrams (ESD), with fault tree (FT) models. This ET-FT binary logic framework provides a structured approach to analyzing risk scenarios, with causal depth represented by the "basic events" defining each scenario. Introduced in 2005, the hybrid causal logic (HCL) methodology extended the ET-FT model to incorporate Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN), capturing the logical and inferential dependencies within a single, cohesive model. HCL was developed to address limitations in PRA, especially to account for “soft causal factors†where causation cannot be fully or deterministically established, such as human and organizational failures. This methodology has found applications across sectors, including nuclear, aviation, petrochemical, maritime, space, and healthcare. While the HCL solution algorithm, covered by a U.S. patent and integrated into platforms like Trilith and PSIM, has been utilized extensively, its algorithmic details have not been previously disclosed.

Keywords: Hybrid probabilistic risk models; Binary decision diagram; Hybrid Causal Logic HCL); Complex systems; Interdependencies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025007197
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025007197

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111519

Access Statistics for this article

Reliability Engineering and System Safety is currently edited by Carlos Guedes Soares

More articles in Reliability Engineering and System Safety from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-30
Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025007197