Multi-criteria decision analysis for evaluating carbon capture technologies in power plants

Nima Sepahi, Adrian Ilinca and Daniel R. Rousse

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2025, vol. 219, issue C

Abstract: Power plants are among the largest contributors to CO2 emissions, making carbon capture and conversion into valuable products a key strategy to combat climate change and foster a circular economy. However, selecting the optimal CO2 capture technology is complex due to the wide range of options — such as pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion — and the various technical, economic, environmental, and social factors involved. This study identifies the most promising CO2 capture technologies for three power plant types: Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC), lignite, and coal. By applying Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), which integrates a systematic literature review with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the study ranks existing technologies. For NGCC plants, post-combustion calcium looping emerged as the top choice, with a relative closeness score of 0.790, due to its moderate CO2 avoidance cost (€33.80/tCO2), high efficiency (48.31%), and mature Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of 7. In lignite plants, post-combustion chemical absorption with MDEA ranked highest, achieving a relative closeness of 0.865 and a TRL of 9. For coal plants, pre-combustion using the Selexol process combined with Mn-based chemical looping was most promising, with a relative closeness of 0.829, low CO2 avoidance cost (€19.94/tCO2), and a net efficiency of 37.13%. These findings underscore the importance of balancing economic performance and technological maturity when selecting CO2 capture technologies.

Keywords: Multi-criteria decision analysis; Oxy-fuel combustion; Post-combustion; Pre-combustion; AHP; TOPSIS; CO2 capture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003727
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:219:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125003727

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115699

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().