A Markov model examining intervention effects on the HIV prevalence/incidence amongst the overall population

Arash Ghayoori and Rakesh Nagi

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2022, vol. 79, issue C

Abstract: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) remains a high burden in Africa. Several targeted prevention strategies are prevalent including the promotion of condom use, provision of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Optimal allocation of limited resources requires understanding how the HIV epidemic will be affected by these strategies. We develop a Markov model, considering four sub-populations: female sex workers (FSWs), general population (GP), sex clients (SCs), and men who have sex with men (MSM), which estimates the effects of these strategies on the HIV prevalence/incidence in Rwanda from 2017 to 2027. Using Rwanda's demographic, sexual risk behavior, and HIV-associated morbidity/mortality data, it was determined that by 2027, a 30% improvement in consistent condom use amongst female sex workers would reduce the HIV prevalence amongst female sex workers, sex clients, and the general population by 7.86%, 5.97%, and 0.17%, respectively. Secondly, while making improvements on the recurrent HIV testing as well as ART coverage only mildly reduces the prevalence/incidence amongst female sex workers, and sex clients, reducing the two would result in an increase in the HIV prevalence/incidence amongst FSWs and SCs. Lastly, our analysis shows that introduction of PrEP to female sex workers in 2019 is expected to reduce the HIV incidence amongst FSWs by 1.28% over the next decade. We further analyze scaling-up PrEP beyond the highest-risk population, i.e., FSWs, and weigh population-level impact with cost-effectiveness to make an informed priority-setting amongst women in the general population. We modeled the HIV risk to women, and computed the impact, cost, and cost-effectiveness of PrEP scale-up for younger women aged 15–25, women aged 25–34, and women aged 35–49 years, while accounting for the low program retention levels reported in demonstration projects. Perhaps, counter-intuitively, it is shown that PrEP could substantially avert more infections a year amongst women in the general population than amongst female sex workers. In summary, our models and analysis could help decision makers effectively allocate resources to each of these prevention/treatment strategies amongst different sub-populations.

Keywords: Health economics; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Markov model; Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP); Safe-sex promotion; Antiretroviral therapy (ART) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012121001154
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:soceps:v:79:y:2022:i:c:s0038012121001154

DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101123

Access Statistics for this article

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences is currently edited by Barnett R. Parker

More articles in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().