Has the long-term care insurance resolved disparities in mortality for older Koreans? examination of service type and income level

Minsung Sohn, Patricia O'Campo, Carles Muntaner, Haejoo Chung and Mankyu Choi

Social Science & Medicine, 2020, vol. 247, issue C

Abstract: The long-term care insurance (LTCI) has been implemented to help the government take responsibility for social prevention and protection measures to maintain and improve older adults' health and well-being since 2008. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of LTCI on mortality of elders in South Korea. The data used from the national representative Elderly Cohort Database for 2009 to 2013. We analyzed longitudinal panel data from 61,235 persons aged 65 years and older. We generated Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models by use and type of long-term care services (LTCSs) (e.g., non-user, facility, and in-home benefits) and income level. The covariate-adjusted approximate mortality rates by LTCSs type for facility and in-home benefits group compared to non-LTCS users were 0.761 and 0.803, respectively. The approximate mortality rates were higher in the middle low- (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.131, p < .001), low- (HR = 1.125, p < .001), and middle- (HR = 1.122, p < .001) than the high income group. In particular, the disparities in mortality by income gap in in-home care users of LTCS was greater than that of facility care users in Korea. Consequently, these findings point to the need for program improvements to the quality and quantity of the in-home LTCSs for elderly Koreans. Ensuring a “continuum of care” through education for service providers and stronger relationships with the recipients’ families could improve overall quality. There is a particular need to devote more attention to the needs of low-income elderly who currently lack sufficient the health coverage.

Keywords: Long term care insurance; Home care; Facility-based service; Quality of care; Elderly; Mortality; Survival analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953620300319
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:247:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620300319

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112812

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().