Rural health care: A British success or a tale of unmet need?

Richard Fearn

Social Science & Medicine, 1987, vol. 24, issue 3, 263-274

Abstract: Discussion over health needs and health care in the U.K. has mainly centred on the urban area. The countryside has not been included in this debate because it is assumed that rural people are healthier than their urban counterparts and that health and social services are more effective. This paper questions these two premises and shows higher than expected levels of illness in the rural area and the health services to be largely dependent on general practice which, like all rural services, is becoming increasingly centralised and inaccessible. What is needed, it is argued, is the construction of a case for more localised care. Not that this should necessarily lead to a singularly rural type of health service, rather that patterns of provision should be adapted to local needs wherever they are situated.

Keywords: accessibility; rural; health; care; general; practitioner (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90053-0
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:3:p:263-274

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().