Inequalities of spatial primary healthcare accessibility in China

Peng Jia, Youfa Wang, Min Yang, Limin Wang, Xuchao Yang, Xinyu Shi, Lijian Yang, Jin Wen, Yi Liu, Maokang Yang, Junguo Xin, Fengying Zhang, Lihua Jiang, Chunhua Chi, Luxia Zhang, Xudong Ma, Xiao Ma, Li Zhao and Weimin Li

Social Science & Medicine, 2022, vol. 314, issue C

Abstract: A key step to the establishment of a tiered healthcare system is equitable access to basic primary healthcare services for all. However, no quantitative research on the national status quo of primary healthcare accessibility in China exists. We filled this gap by estimating spatial accessibility to primary healthcare centers (PHCs) and mapping its inequality across the mainland China. Four national datasets during 2015–2018, including administrative boundaries, residential communities, points-of-interest (including PHCs), and road networks, were collected to calculate the distance to the nearest PHC for each community. Five other national datasets including census, elevation, land use, vegetation, and nightlight, were collected to model 100m × 100 m population grids, based on which geographical modeling was used to calculate PHC accessibility of each community. Inequalities in PHC accessibility across China were described with concentration indices. About 44% of communities across China representing approximately 30% of the overall population had no access to PHCs within their 6-km catchment areas; about 78% of communities across China representing approximately 68.4% of the overall population had no access to PHCs within their 1.5-km catchment areas. Some municipalities/provinces like Shanghai, Beijing, Tianjin, Jiangsu, Shandong, and Zhejiang generally had higher proximity to the nearest PHCs, while others like Tibet, Guizhou, and Guangxi had lower proximity to the nearest PHCs. However, assuming similar basic service capacity across all PHCs, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Chongqing showed the lowest PHC accessibility due to high population density. Variations in PHC accessibility existed, with more inequalities observed in the north and northeastern provinces and less inequalities in southwestern and south-central provinces. This study demonstrates primary healthcare accessibility and inequality at province and city levels, and identifies communities with lower proximity and accessibility to PHCs in China. It would serve as a starting point to facilitate precise healthcare planning and preparedness for health emergencies in China.

Keywords: Primary healthcare; Community healthcare; Spatial accessibility; Inequality; Population modeling; China; Healthcare accessibility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362200764X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:314:y:2022:i:c:s027795362200764x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115458

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().