 Reported versus recorded health service utilization in Grenada, West IndiesMichael V. Hayes, S. Martin Taylor, Lillian R. Bayne and Blake D. Poland Social Science & Medicine, 1990, vol. 31, issue 4, 455-460 Abstract: Calls for household surveys to provide information on service utilization in less developed countries raise questions regarding the accuracy and reliability of reporting. This paper compares reported to recorded health service utilization for diarrhoea and any other morbidity over a 2-week and 3-month period for information obtained from a household survey in Grenada, West Indies. A sensitivity analysis is used to derive minimum and maximum estimates of the accuracy of reported utilization. Over-reporting utilization was found to be between 33 and 62% for diarrhoea and 49 and 81% for any other morbidity. Under-reporting of all utilization was estimated to be between 47 and 65%. These results cast doubt on the utility of household surveys as a reliable source of information regarding service utilization. Keywords: reported; utilization; sensitivity; analysis; Grenada; diarrhoea; household; survey (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:4:p:455-460 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.