Aversion to income, ethnic, and geographic related health inequality: Evidence from Australia

Marie-Anne Boujaoude, Kim Dalziel, Richard Cookson, Nancy Devlin and Natalie Carvalho

Social Science & Medicine, 2025, vol. 364, issue C

Abstract: This study investigated the Australian general public's views on trade-offs between reducing health inequalities and improving total health. It elicited relative equity weights, comparing inequalities in life expectancy at birth across three equity-relevant dimensions: income (comparing poorest versus richest fifth), ethnic (comparing Indigenous versus non-Indigenous), and geographic (comparing rural/remote versus major cities). A benefit trade-off exercise was administered via online survey to a sample of Australian adults (n = 3105) using quota sampling to ensure population representativeness across key demographic variables (age, gender, state of residence, household income and education level). When comparing income groups, 88% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 82%–92%) of the respondents were health inequality averse, with 42% (95% CI: 34%–51%) demonstrating extreme inequality aversion. When considering Indigenous status, 85% (95% CI: 79%–90%) showed inequality aversion, and 40% (95% CI: 31%–49%) displayed extreme aversion. Lastly, looking at different geographic locations, 74% (95% CI: 66%–80%) of the respondents were inequality averse, with 37% (95% CI: 29%–46%) showing extreme inequality aversion. The relative equity weights were calculated, allowing for varying baseline inequalities in life expectancy – proportional gaps of 10.8%, 5.1% and 6.3%, respectively. The results imply that the public is willing to weight incremental health gains to the poorest fifth five times more than to the richest fifth, six times more for Indigenous versus non-Indigenous, and four times more for people living in rural and remote areas compared to major cities.

Keywords: Health equity; Inequality aversion; Health related social welfare function; Kolm index; Atkinson index; Indigenous; Rural (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624009493
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:364:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624009493

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117495

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().