The patient double bind: Seeking outsiders while creating insiders

Patricia Satterstrom, Fletcher Dementyev, Maura Danehey, Chancey B. Herbolsheimer and Timothy J. Vogus

Social Science & Medicine, 2025, vol. 383, issue C

Abstract: Including patients and their ideas is critical for helping organizations better serve patients. Yet patient partners are often tokenized, which limits the scope and impact of their contributions. In this 23-month longitudinal inductive study of patient participation in multidisciplinary healthcare change teams in three outpatient clinics, we explore the microprocesses that impact patient contributions and the teams’ responses to them. We selected a healthcare organization that was committed to using best practices and evidence-based methodologies when designing, launching, and supporting multidisciplinary teams that included patients and aimed to create more patient-centered clinics. To understand how patients contributed and how their contributions were received by the team, we followed patient-team interactions throughout 142 meetings – supplemented with observations, interviews, and archival data. We observed that, while teams welcomed patients, the patients faced recurring cycles of marginalization, narrowing, and redefining what it means to be a patient member of the team. When patients contributed like staff team members or provided convergent incremental patient perspectives on staff-centered projects, their contributions were more likely to be accepted; whereas when patient contributions diverged–challenged and/or offered alternatives to staff assumptions, priorities, and processes–they faced resistance. We mapped three pathways for patients: 1. Empowerment to Exit, 2. Empowerment to Acceptance, and 3. Team Reframing to Patient Adaptation. By delving into how well-intentioned interactions reshaped patient contributions, we develop new theory to better understand how patients and staff may be limited in their ability/mindset to become more patient-centered.

Keywords: Patient partners; Change teams; Longitudinal qualitative research; Double-bind (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625007063
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007063

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118375

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().