EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Clinical bias and gout: How stigma impacts patient care

Joseph A. Vitriol, Jeffrey M. Hunger, Adam Magerman, Brian LaMoreaux and Larry Edwards

Social Science & Medicine, 2025, vol. 384, issue C

Abstract: The management of gout, a condition historically laden with stigma and misconceptions about its underlying causes, stands at a critical juncture. Despite significant advances in understanding its pathophysiology and treatment, gout management remains inconsistent and at odds with prevailing clinical guidelines and evidenced-based standards. This study investigates how inaccurate physician beliefs about gout can bias clinical judgment and contribute to compromised patient care. Across two independent samples (Pilot Study, N = 106; Main Study, N = 321), we examined how practicing rheumatologists evaluated patients with gout or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without stigma-related behavioral profiles (e.g., alcohol use, BMI). Participants completed a vignette experiment followed by a survey assessing causal attributions, treatment efficacy, and perceptions of patient responsibility. We find that gout-related stigma biases rheumatologists' causal beliefs, treatment recommendations, and expectations of patient compliance and adherence. Gout patients, compared to those with other forms of inflammatory arthritis, were misperceived as engaging in lifestyle choices that contribute to their disease severity and course. These misperceptions led to the attribution that gout patients were uniquely responsible for the cause and management of their condition, and were therefore assumed to be less compliant with or less likely to benefit from effective pharmacological and biological therapies. Importantly, these biases were observed in judgments of realistic patients whose behavioral profiles reflected gout-related stereotypes, even when disease severity and symptomology were otherwise identical. These findings underscore the urgent need to address gout-related stigma among healthcare providers as a critical step to improving patient outcomes and care.

Keywords: Stigma; Bias; Healthcare; Patient care; Body weight (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500797X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:384:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500797x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118466

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-10-21
Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:384:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500797x