 Using willingness to pay to value alternative models of antenatal careMandy Ryan, Julie Ratcliffe and Janet Tucker Social Science & Medicine, 1997, vol. 44, issue 3, 371-380 Abstract: Recent years have seen the development of different models of antenatal care, especially for low risk women. More specifically, there has been a move for more general practitioner and midwifery involvement in such care. Given the current changes that are taking place in the provision of antenatal care, it is becoming increasingly important to carry out economic evaluations of alternative models of care. This paper applies the economic instrument of willingness to pay to assess the benefits of two alternative forms of antenatal care: general practitioner/midwife routine led care versus obstetrician led care. The results suggest a willingness to pay of £2500 for antenatal care, with no significant difference between the types of care provided. It is concluded that before firm policy conclusions can be reached, further studies should be undertaken to address methodological issues around the willingness to pay technique. Keywords: closed-ended; willing; to; pay; antenatal; care (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:44:y:1997:i:3:p:371-380 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.