 When providers and community leaders define health priorities: the results of a Delphi survey in the canton of GenevaD. Schopper, C. Ammon, A. Ronchi and A. Rougemont Social Science & Medicine, 2000, vol. 51, issue 3, 335-342 Abstract: The Delphi method was used to determine the health priorities in one Swiss canton. The opinion of various groups concerned, either as health professionals or as representatives of the general population, was gathered to identify the health determinants and health problems perceived as most important, to clarify the reasons for these choices, and to recommend interventions to be undertaken in order to improve the situation in the identified priority areas. Five panels, including health professionals as well as selected leaders of community groups with no direct involvement in health, were given the opportunity to reply to two rounds of questionnaires. There was a high convergence of opinion on health determinants and problems to be given priority between panels and between the first and second round. Priorities identified are mainly physical problems (cardiovascular disease, respiratory and breast cancer, AIDS, injuries due to road accidents, chronic back pain), psychosocial disorders (depression, suicide, violence in the family, stress), and problems of substance abuse (alcohol and tobacco). Unemployment and social isolation were chosen because of their perceived impact on health. Very few interventions were proposed in the medical technical or research areas. This may be due partly to the fact that good quality care is widely available and accessible in Geneva, whereas preventive programmes have not received enough attention in the past. Through the identified priorities and the proposed activities, a new vision of health emerges which gives more importance to psychosocial problems and the social environment. In this context, health promotion is seen as essential, acknowledging that sustained change in individual behaviours can only occur if the social and cultural context is taken into consideration. In conclusion, the results of this survey show that the Delphi method is a useful tool to reach consensus on health priorities and corresponding activities among a variety of actors. Keywords: Delphi; survey; Health; priorities; Priority; setting (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:3:p:335-342 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.