Bridging the “Two Cultures” divide in medicine and the academy

David J. Skorton

Technology in Society, 2010, vol. 32, issue 1, 49-52

Abstract: This article discusses the contemporary validity of C. P. Snow's concept of a sharp division between the sciences and the humanities, with particular attention given to academia, medical education, and biomedical research. Believing that today the social sciences must be included as a third culture, the author views ethics, especially bioethics, as integral to all three cultures and forming vital links among them. The author examines the teaching of ethics in medical schools as well as the role of cultures and cultural values in contemporary bioethics, using the embryonic stem cell debate as an example. The author concludes that the three cultures are capable of bridging the gaps between them in increasingly productive ways.

Keywords: Bioethics; Biomedical research; C. P. Snow; Embryonic stem cells; Ethics; Humanities; Medicine; Science; Snow, C. P.; Stem cells; Three cultures; Two cultures (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X09001055
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:teinso:v:32:y:2010:i:1:p:49-52

DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.12.009

Access Statistics for this article

Technology in Society is currently edited by Charla Griffy-Brown

More articles in Technology in Society from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().