Impact analysis of positive utility and built environment on car use for non-work trips: an ensemble approach

Enayat Mirzaei, Ehsan Heidarzadeh, Amin Hashemi, Mohammad Bagher Dowlatshahi and Reza Kheyroddin

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2025, vol. 199, issue C

Abstract: Although the Positive Utility of Travel (PUT) has been well discussed in the relevant literature, there remain research gaps in practice, particularly regarding how this utility can be effectively incorporated into conventional transportation models. Additionally, there is a need for further exploration of how the built environment influences car use for non-work trips with different levels of intrinsic utility. In this regard, distinguishing trips by the context of destination and/or purpose (as an approach in previous studies) is not a perfect method, as the intrinsic utility of trips may be different for each trip regardless of these contexts. To address this gap, we modified the conventional travel survey and collected the required data in fall 2022 and spring 2023 from 1170 respondents residing in Shiraz, Iran. Based on a series of questions about each reported trip, two types of travel were recognized by fuzzy C-means clustering: Low PUT and High PUT. Interestingly, about 56% of non-work trips were undertaken both to reach a destination and to travel itself. Furthermore, using a novel ensemble analysis approach, we found that five variables, including population density, block density, outdoor space proximity, positive attitude toward transit and family size, significantly affect car use for both types of travel. However, the importance of these variables differs for different trip types. According to the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) results, motorcycle ownership and outdoor space proximity are the most important variables for predicting car use for trips with low PUT, while family size and population density are the most influential variables for explaining car use for trips with high PUT.

Keywords: Travel mode choice; Built environment; Travel motivations; Ensemble learning; Shiraz (Iran) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002174
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:transa:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002174

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104589

Access Statistics for this article

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice is currently edited by John (J.M.) Rose

More articles in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().