When is a search not a search? Part 2 - Non-unity, the EPO approach

Jeremy R.M. Scott and Sytse de Jonge

World Patent Information, 2008, vol. 30, issue 3, 199-205

Abstract: Unity of Invention is one of those requirements of the EPC which are sometimes difficult to grasp. In this article an attempt is made to explain the unity reasoning applied by the EPO by using examples from daily life. Three types of reasoning (a quick approach, the single general inventive concept approach and the special technical features approach) are discussed. The procedural steps in relation to non-unity at the search and examination stages are also described. Whilst the following article comments on EPO procedure, it is the opinion of the authors alone, and is not an official EPO view.

Keywords: Non-unity; Plurality; EPO; Inventive; concept; Special; technical; features; WOISA; ESOP; PCT (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172-2190(07)00180-9
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:worpat:v:30:y:2008:i:3:p:199-205

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

World Patent Information is currently edited by Michael Blackman

More articles in World Patent Information from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().