On the urban bias of patents and the scaling of innovation

Josef Taalbi and Mikhail Martynovich

No 2422, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) from Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography

Abstract: While recent studies have heralded large cities as “innovation machines†, the majority of regional studies of innovation are based on patent indicators. In this paper, we compare regional patent and innovation counts in Sweden (1970-2014) and document the presence of a sizeable urban bias in patent indicators, which is primarily explained by higher patent filing propensity in urban areas. We also show that using administrative spatial units which do not account for spatial organization of economic activity tends to exacerbate this bias. This poses a problem for academic studies that wish to understand regional innovation, or policy reports benchmarking regional performance.

Keywords: Regional Innovation; Patents; Urban Scaling; Urban Bias of Patents (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-07, Revised 2024-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-geo, nep-sbm, nep-tid and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg2422.pdf Version July 2024 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:egu:wpaper:2422

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) from Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).