Cost of utilising maternal health services in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas, Francis Ayomoh, Ibukun-Oluwa Aberjirinde, Oluwasola Banke-Thomas, Ejemai Amaize Eboreime and Charles Ameh

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: Background: Cost is a major barrier to maternal health service utilisation for many women in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, comparable evidence of the available cost data in these countries is limited. We conducted a systematic review and comparative analysis of costs of utilising maternal health services in these settings. Methods: We searched peer-reviewed and grey literature databases for articles reporting cost of utilising maternal health services in LMICs published post-2000. All retrieved records were screened and articles meeting the inclusion criteria selected. Quality assessment was performed using the relevant cost-specific criteria of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. To guarantee comparability, disaggregated costs data were inflated to 2019 US dollar equivalents. Total adjusted costs and cost drivers associated with utilising each service were systematically compared. Where heterogeneity in methods or non-disaggregated costs was observed, narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings. Results: Thirty-six studies met our inclusion criteria. Many of the studies costed multiple services. However, the most frequently costed services were utilisation of normal vaginal delivery (22 studies), caesarean delivery (13), and antenatal care (ANC) (10). The least costed services were post-natal care (PNC) and post-abortion care (PAC) (5 each). Studies used varied methods for data collection and analysis and their quality ranged from low to high with most assessed as average or high. Generally, across all included studies, cost of utilisation progressively increased from ANC and PNC to delivery and PAC, and from public to private providers. Medicines and diagnostics were main cost drivers for ANC and PNC while cost drivers were variable for delivery. Women experienced financial burden of utilising maternal health services and also had to pay some unofficial costs to access care, even where formal exemptions existed. Conclusion: Consensus regarding approach for costing maternal health services will help to improve their relevance for supporting policy-making towards achieving universal health coverage. If indeed the post-2015 mission of the global community is to “leave no one behind,” then we need to ensure that women and their families are not facing unnecessary and unaffordable costs that could potentially tip them into poverty. Prospero Registration Number: CRD42019150058.

Keywords: maternal health; utilisation; cost; economic evaluation; systematic review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: N0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 14 pages
Date: 2021-09-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 1, September, 2021, 10(9), pp. 564 - 577. ISSN: 2322-5939

Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/105081/ Open access version. (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:105081

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().