EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Indigenous land and colonial institutions: how Aztec and Tupi landownership practices impacted the haciendas of New Spain and engenhos in Brazil

Vitória Russo Gaino

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: This paper adds to the literature on origins of institutions through a comparative study of landownership in colonial Mexico and Brazil and argues that pre-colonial indigenous land practices were key in shaping colonial outcomes. While both Portugal and Spain drew on their institutional traditions and historical experience with land grants to introduce the sesmarias and merced systems in the New World, different outcomes emerged. In New Spain, the haciendas produced cash crops and livestock using indigenous labour in large agricultural enterprises. In Brazil, the engenhos, similarly large private landholdings dedicated to sugar production for large-scale export, employed African slave labour almost exclusively. This variation can in part be traced back to the impact of land institutions – while the Aztecs in New Spain were familiar with private landholdings for nobility, the Tupi’s nomadic nature meant that private land was virtually inexistent before colonisation. Hence, the Spanish colonists were able to adapt and build on existing Aztec practices, such as granting land to nobility and using the encomienda labour draft to work these private lands. However, when the Portuguese introduced the sesmaria in coastal Brazil and attempted to get indigenous labour to work the fields, the Tupi rebelled, fought, and fled, and colonists turned to African slave labour instead.

JEL-codes: F54 Q15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
Date: 2024-02-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-his
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/125844/ Open access version. (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:125844

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:125844