The impulsive approach to procyclicality: measuring the reactiveness of risk-based initial margin models to changes in market conditions using impulse response functions

Pedro Gurrola Perez and David Murphy

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: In recent years, many derivatives market participants received large margin calls in episodes of elevated market volatility such as the onset of the Covid-19 global pandemic and the illegal Russian invasion of Ukraine. The lack of some market participants’ preparedness to meet these calls resulted in liquidity stress and reinvigorated the policy debate about how reactive margin should be to changes in market conditions. This debate has been hampered by the lack of a generally accepted way of measuring the reactiveness of the models used to calculate initial margin. The first contribution of this paper is to provide such a measure. We consider a step function in volatility, and examine the responses of various initial margin models to paths of risk factor returns consistent with this impulse, introducing the impulse response function as a convenient means of presenting this reaction. The results presented demonstrate that a model's impulse response is a robust and useful measure of its reactiveness. This approach could be used both to measure initial margin model reactiveness, or procyclicality as it is often termed, and to capture the uncertainty in this measurement. It also provides significant, novel insights into the behaviour of some economically important margin models. In particular, the tendency of some filtered historical simulation value at risk models to over-react to sharp stepwise increases in volatility is demonstrated and the reasons for it are explored. The behaviour of two widely-used anti-procyclicality tools, the buffer and the use of a stressed period, are also analysed: the latter is found to be more successful at mitigating procyclicality than the former. The paper concludes with a discussion of the policy implications of the results presented.

Keywords: anti-procyclicality; impulse response function; initial margin model; margin model response; procyclicality; volatility estimation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C12 C52 G13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17 pages
Date: 2025-11-30
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Borsa Istanbul Review, 30, November, 2025, 25(6), pp. 1166 - 1182. ISSN: 2214-8450

Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/128641/ Open access version. (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Unavailable (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/128641/ [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/128641/)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:128641

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().