Corporate consensus and the OECDs human rights mechanism
Stefanie Khoury and
David Whyte
Chapter 4 in The Elgar Companion to the OECD, 2023, pp 37-49 from Edward Elgar Publishing
Abstract:
The OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises are uniquely placed as a corporate responsibility instrument. It is the only standing international mechanism available to lodge complaints directly against transnational corporations that has legal force obliging signatory governments. This chapter assesses the efficacy of the Guidelines in addressing human rights violations by corporations. It analyses a data set of complaint outcomes made using the OECD Guidelines procedure in order to assess their ability to resolve conflicts. This analysis finds that that 12 per cent of cases were resolved to the mutual satisfaction of both parties. On average this adds up to between three and four cases every year. The chapter concludes that we are therefore dealing with a few cases that can, in global terms, only be described as token. Therefore, rather than providing a mechanism that encourages consensual decision-making, National Contact Points have a different role: they ‘manage’ rather than resolve complaints.
Keywords: Economics and Finance; Politics and Public Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781800886872.00010 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:20739_4
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().